Carbon-sequestering science: an alternative to "pesky electronics"?

imposed by DHHS and, if so, what they should be. As the biomedical and behavioral research community continues to adopt policies and procedures that deal effectively with allegations or suspicions of scientific misconduct, the OSI should find fewer occasions to conduct its own investigations. Strong institutional frameworks for dealing with scientific misconduct also will enable the PHS to focus on its primary responsibilities in this area; namely, monitoring institutional compliance with PHS policies and regulations and developing prevention and education programs. It is widely believed that scientific misconduct is not widespread. Nevertheless, even a small number of instances of scientific misconduct is unacceptable. As the steward of the vast majority of available federal awards for biomedical and behavioral research, the PHS will ensure that an effective process is in place for dealing with scientific misconduct. JAMES 0. MASON Assistant Secretary for Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 20201